![]() |
New guy here; is this an error coin?? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: New guy here; is this an error coin??Posted: 07 Nov 2009 at 3:44am |
Did you find anything out yet? Thanks |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 Nov 2009 at 12:49am |
|
Yes it's damge all right
Jazzcoins
|
|
![]() |
|
foundinrolls
New Member
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 2009 at 12:10pm |
|
Hi,
The coin appears to be damaged. If I had to guess, I would also say that a dip in acetone would remove what is there. It looks like an adhesive of some sort that left a residue on the coin. Perhaps the coin was glued to something. Thanks |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Oct 2009 at 8:47am |
|
Did you try acetone to remove any foreign substance?
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Oct 2009 at 10:09pm |
|
What appears on your coin is a substance somebody deliberatly did glue on the surface and this is post mint damage.
Zectar
|
|
![]() |
|
Gilly
New Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2009 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Sep 2009 at 5:46am |
|
I don't have a picture, not even a red "X" box.
I will make a further attempt to take it to that one expert in my area, I could also spend some money to have a true error expert examine it (that guy that wrote a book on errors, who also does a magazine or newsletter on errors).
Gilly
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Sep 2009 at 9:07am |
|
Okay, it's not a great example, but, it's a solder, look at the black marks near the top. See, it doesn't leave the surface distorted. I'm still unsure.
Isaiah |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Sep 2009 at 9:04am |
It's not a solder. Solders leaved the surface relatively undistorted, but, give it a ring around the center, that looks burnt, or sometimes like black "Goop", but, it's nothing like this, I'll post a picture of a soldered coin, if I can find one. Isaiah |
|
![]() |
|
Gilly
New Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2009 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Sep 2009 at 7:52am |
|
How about solder? One guy I showed it to says it looks like it was soldered onto something. I went to another place, recommended by the first place I went to, where the guy is supposed to be knowledgeable about error coins. But the "specialist" wasn't in.
Gilly
|
|
![]() |
|
Gilly
New Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2009 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 12:17pm |
|
(I just posted that previous post. I had it on my computer awhile while I was looking some more.)
I grabbed another KHD, and it almost does look like the design elements/shapes I can pick out might be more related to the reverse of a KHD rather than the obverse.
One of the noticeable items that caught my eye is above the left claw (the one with the olive branch). There should be a fairly smooth area, bordered by the bottom leaves of the olive branch, the top of the leg (included the feathered area, what I would describe as "the drumstick", and the bottom feathers, the closest to the eagles body. That area is roughly outlined, although it is not smooth inside those boundaries. The 3 toes of the claw are plainly visible in the proper area. The branch (the part the eagle has in his claw) is visible but looks somewhat distorted, almost too much definition. I can just vaguely make out what I think is the zig-zag of the eagles wing feathers.
I know a bit about mechanics, I can understand the process of making a coin, but not a lot of the possible errors. Could the obverse die just fail? Could something have gotten between the planchet and die?
Gilly
|
|
![]() |
|
Gilly
New Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2009 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 12:04pm |
|
I keep trying to look at it as though it is a die clash, comparing the obverse side (inverted) over the reverse design and seeing if I can pick out anything I can tell for sure. I just can't though. OH and wouldn't the obverse also be damaged? The obverse looks just fine.
However (and I might be talking myself in to this) I almost think I am able to pick up on a few details in the damage that seem to be the eye area and ear area of the obverse.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 11:21am |
Interesting. It's possible for errors and various die flaws to effect only the obverse, or only the reverse, which also makes me think it's a mint error, and not just some bored guy with too much time on his hands. If it was intentional, they would have most likely annihilated both obverse and reverse. ~Isaiah |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 11:14am |
Yes, if you do bring this to him, let me know what he says, please. I'm curious. Isaiah edit also, be sure to point out the areas that look to be a possible clashed die to him. :) Edited by Isaiah - 21 Sep 2009 at 11:15am |
|
![]() |
|
Gilly
New Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2009 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 11:11am |
|
I was going to take a bunch of coins in to a coin shop this week. Mostly they are what I believe are referred to as "sliders", old stuff only really worth the silver, (walkers and Mercurys with dates completely gone, Washingtons not much better, some Peace and Barber Dollars that aren't rare dates, etc.
I could bring this Kennedy in and see what he thinks. I know this shop has been around a few decades and I trust him, really nice guy, even threw in a few nice coins when i bought a 20th Century Type set case from him.
Gilly
PS Again it's a 67 so silver clad, and the obverse looks very nice, no distortion, no signs of trauma, either at the mint or at the mercy of some idle hands, I would call it AU or EF with a bunch of plus signs on the condition of the obverse. Edited by Gilly - 21 Sep 2009 at 11:16am |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |